Orbit Post Sitemap

The night really turns people into something else, are longs feeling numb? In 24 hours, $1.19 billion liquidated, 190,000 people. Long positions liquidated $1.056 billion, shorts only $135 million. One-sided, eight longs go down for every short. How did it come to this? A few days ago, the non-farm payrolls surprised on the downside, interest rate expectations eased, everyone thought it was stable, longs crowded in tightly, funding rates soared. When longs crowd in, someone has to take the losses. Last night the minutes turned hawkish, oil prices rose another 5%, two triggers at once, leverage exploded in a chain reaction. ETH at 2532, BTC at 82163, ZEC down 11% in one day. I know this story well. Last week I was taken out like this, 75x leverage, 16 minutes. This week it's 190,000 people's turn. So don't ask why the ETF is still flowing in but prices keep falling. Spot is buying, leverage is liquidating. Slow money builds positions bit by bit, fast money gets wiped out overnight. Slow money builds, fast money gets collected. The market isn't all red. Gold is the only one closing up, +0.7%. The money hasn't left, it's just hiding, hiding in gold, hiding out of leverage. After this round of liquidations, funding rates will be cleaned out, then we can start watching. But don't rush, wait for it to cool down completely. What do you think, is this liquidation the last drop or halfway down the mountain? #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？ $BTC $ETH $XAU As mentioned before, Bitcoin has already formed a double top pattern on the chart, and the market has weakened as expected, with the largest drop yesterday approaching 7,000 points. The overall major trend remains bearish. The current rise is merely a short-term corrective rebound after the decline, not a trend reversal. In the short term, focus on the resistance zone between 82,300 and 82,800. If the price rebounds to this area and shows signs of resistance, you can continue to position short, targeting the 80,000 level below, attempting a breakdown. $BTC Long and Short Crowding List｜Last 15 Minutes $NEAR negative fee rate is deeper than the recent same period, rising, with limited position changes. Price +0.57%, position volume basically flat; current fee rate -0.0163% (8-hour period). $CRV negative fee rate is deeper than the recent same period, rising, with limited position changes. Price +0.6%, position volume basically flat; current fee rate -0.0114% (8-hour period).$SNDK SanDisk's resistance near 1740 should not be underestimated; if it fails to break through, it will directly fall all the way down to around 1586. Reducing positions in the 1720-40 range in the past two days was still the right call, as one should not be overly optimistic about the resistance level. Around 1580 is also a support level I personally favor, still choosing to buy on dips to test long positions. Short-term resistance is first seen at 1680, then 1740, and around 1815. AI infrastructure continues to drive strong structural demand for NAND. SanDisk management cited industry forecasts predicting the flash memory market will exceed $300 billion by 2026 and approach $500 billion by 2027. However, valuations are already high, so be cautious with position sizing when going long at these levels. If key support breaks, it's time to exit. The above are my personal views for reference only As the surgical lights come on and anesthesia hasn't fully taken effect, the novice's heart is pushed into the cold arrest of the crypto market—this isn't a pre-op briefing, but an emergency open-chest surgery without senior supervision. Beginner topics lay out mistakes like pathological specimens, treat questions as pre-op checks, interpret official guidelines as extracorporeal circulation circuits, and take expert answers as intraoperative ultrasounds. There are no stupid questions here, only lesions yet to be incised. $xBMNR's linkage with US stock tokens is like a hidden bypass in cardiac conduction: on the surface, price fluctuations; underneath, liquidity preload, leverage afterload, US dollar interest rates, and risk appetite jointly rewrite inflow and outflow volumes. A price crash is just chest pain, not a myocardial infarction itself; focusing only on intraday charts is like watching heart rate without perfusion. To check coronary arteries: is the funding rate persistently distorted, are open positions bulging like a ventricular aneurysm, does stablecoin premium indicate insufficient capacity, and do US Treasury yields cause systemic vasoconstriction? The truly fatal issue isn't novice questions, but erroneous experience treated as standard procedure, repeatedly stitched by the community into scar tissue that can't dilate during the next ischemic event. Novice education is like postoperative follow-up—it can reduce complications but cannot replace the surgeon's judgment; reward mechanisms are like pain pumps—they relieve pain but don't address bleeding. Common beginner mistakes include cutting without anticoagulation, mistaking community rewards for inotropes, and taking others' profit screenshots as intraoperative navigation. Rewards, curated posts, and expert Q&A are only part of postoperative rehabilitation and cannot replace preoperative diagnosis. The key to $xBMNR's linkage with US stocks is not how much it jumps today, but whether conduction is synchronized: US stocks are like the sinoatrial node, token targets like working myocardium; if the sinoatrial node is disrupted, the myocardium may compensate with tachycardia or develop atrioventricular block. If impulses from US stocks fire but token myocardium doesn't follow, that's conduction block; if token myocardium fires independently, that's ectopic rhythm. All of this comes back to perfusion pressure and volume. The market needs precise diagnosis, not emotional defibrillation. Every price bleed should first ask if it's due to preload deficiency, afterload surge, or myocardial necrosis. Treating novice education as a placebo and linkage as a simple accompaniment leads to every monitor alarm being misread as postoperative pain. By the time puncture site bleeds, drainage tubes surge, and blood pressure curves collapse, the mediastinum is already packed. But if pre-op talks are mistaken for anesthesia, rewards for inotropes, and community applause drowns out monitors, the next ventricular fibrillation won't give you a defibrillation window. #newherestarthere $BTC, $ETH, and $ARB can represent three different perspectives: BTC anchors the market cycle, ETH reflects the overall capital flow in the crypto ecosystem, and ARB shows the capital accumulation strength in the Ethereum L2 ecosystem. Observing these three coins together provides a better judgment of whether the L2 sector has formed a sustained trend than simply watching the price movements of a single coin. #黄金ETF创纪录吸金，高利率仍压制金价 #全球长期国债收益率升至多年高位 #SpaceX加码卫星与AI基础设施投资 BTC falls below 82,000: 2.5 billion shorts waiting above, over 1.5 billion longs buried below $BTC liquidation map update, current BTC price: 81,600. In this chart, two lines are competing: Red line: cumulative long liquidation intensity. Starting from 81,600, climbing leftwards, it has accumulated over 1.5 billion USD on the far left. This means if the price continues to drop, there is a large wave of longs below waiting to be liquidated. Green line: cumulative short liquidation intensity. Starting from 81,600, climbing upwards, it has piled up to over 2.5 billion on the right side. This means if the price moves up, there is a large group of shorts above waiting to be liquidated. Key levels Look at those dense bars, 100x leverage positions are mainly concentrated at: 80,000-82,000: dense long liquidation zone 83,000-84,000: dense short liquidation zone Current price 81,600, right in the middle. Noteworthy signal Shorts above are thicker than longs below. The 2.5 billion short liquidation intensity compared to 1.5 billion long liquidation intensity indicates that the resistance going up might be smaller than going down. The deadliest piece on the chessboard is never the opponent's king, but the pawn you haven't calculated to sacrifice yet—most people focus on the stop-loss line, but no one asks: is this line derived from chess theory or from a racing heartbeat? In every chess game review room, grandmasters never discuss "how much I won," but rather "why didn't I see that knight on move thirty-seven ten moves earlier?" The stop-loss is that knight. It is not a hastily drawn line on the edge of the board, but a necessary conclusion derived from the entire opening library through to the endgame. Setting your stop-loss at last night's panic price is like playing the opening moves by endgame rules; once the pawn chain breaks, the whole game is lost. Position management is more like exchanging pieces. Beginners are obsessed with capturing the opponent's heavy pieces, feeling exhilarated; experts know that deliberately trading a rook for two bishops is to steer the game into an endgame they can understand. Every additional position you take should be a compensated sacrifice—trading time, space, or initiative, never just a spike in your heartbeat. The battlefield of US stock tokens is essentially a simultaneous game on two chessboards. One is the deep waters of the New York opening, the other the shallow waters of the blockchain running 24/7. Two boards, two timers, two liquidity rhythms. Positions checkmated in the deep waters by day will replay at ten times the speed in the shallow waters at night. Those who don't see this are repeatedly checked along the same diagonal, mistakenly thinking it's just bad luck. Experience in chess is always semi-public. The opening library is accessible to all, but midgame judgment is bought with blood. So what truly matters is not which game someone won, but what they saw, gave up, and endured on move thirty-one. Laying failed games on the table is more devastating than hanging victories on the wall—because the chessboard never lies; the cost of a wrong move is always paid by the player. Fear and greed are the breathing rhythms of every player. Greed makes you rush for a killing blow in an advantageous position; fear makes you cede the center in an even game. The real formula is: slowly squeeze when ahead, turning every opponent's move into a multiple-choice question; decisively sacrifice when behind, turning a chaotic mess into the only chance for survival. There are no tactics in the endgame, only arithmetic—whoever's pawn is closer to promotion wins, regardless of emotions. The most expensive phrase on the chessboard is "I thought." #okxtradervoicesMicron's price is strange compared to SanDisk and Hynix; logically, it should have broken 980 by now. This drop should at least reach the previous low around 1012. Currently, there is a divergence on the four-hour chart; let's see again when the market opens tonight.You can try buying a small amount around $XAU 4100—4150 USD to test the waters. Don't move if it falls below 4100 USD; it might still go lower. Add more only after it climbs back above 4200 USD for more stability. There is an upward logic, not repetitive, but the trend is not confirmed yet. Buy in small batches, wait for signals to add more, which is much more reliable than betting on the lowest point.$ETH $BTC BTC and ETH belong to technical rebound after a sharp drop; rebound ≠ trend reversal, the mid-term bearish structure has not been reversed. BTC key resistance at 82200, ETH watching if it can hold at 2495. Dark web Empire Market founder sentenced to 40 years, large amounts of BTC/ETH confiscated; Derive Options V3 migration completed; privacy infrastructure Soda Labs completed $3 million financing. If resistance is met, continue to observe; confirm rebound pressure before choosing direction again. When the load-bearing column was poured up to 237.88 meters, the entire skyscraper did not sway even a bit — this is Nvidia's intraday all-time high on October 2nd, and its total market value was briefly lifted to about 5.7 trillion. I stared at this structural diagram for a long time; what really caught my attention was not the height, but the newly added $150 billion buyback authorization, which pushed the remaining buyback quota to $235 billion, with the construction schedule extending all the way to the end of fiscal year 2028. In the construction industry, this is called continuously reinforcing the core tube with own funds, rather than relying on external financing scaffolding. Morgan Stanley once again listed it as the top pick in the semiconductor sector, citing the continuous expansion of AI infrastructure demand and the growing customer base. This is like seeing the load distribution spread from a single owner to an entire block during blueprint review — single-point load-bearing becomes networked load-bearing, with a completely different risk resistance level. Quarterly revenue was $96.2 billion, up 106% year-over-year, with next quarter guidance between $105.8 billion and $110.1 billion. This growth rate is not a renovation at the finishing level; it’s like adding a new floor every three months, and the foundation keeps up. Back to the perspective on $xPLTR as a related target. It is essentially another structural system on the same construction site — not a heavy-asset skyscraper poured with concrete and steel, but a light steel framework built from data pipelines, decision logic, and model scheduling. As Nvidia’s computing power foundation thickens, this kind of application-layer framework can stack layers upward without deformation. But I want to remind everyone looking at the blueprints: the wind resistance coefficient of the light steel structure entirely depends on how stable the main structure it hangs on is. The main line is the expansion curve of computing power supply, and $xPLTR is the secondary load-bearing component on that curve. There is only one truly professional judgment: the buyback authorization extending to 2028 indicates that the builder believes the design life of this building far exceeds the current floors. And any subcontracted facade work following this building must recalculate their node connection strength — it’s not about cheering for the height, but verifying the load. Structures don’t lie; only people can misread them. #nvidiarecordhighINJ历史最高： 52.62美元。 现在只剩： 6.6—6.8美元左右。 跌幅大约： 87%。 目前按约1亿枚流通口径计算，市值大约： 6.6—6.8亿美元。 过去24小时INJ在各大交易所的成交量大约： 1.38亿美元。 在OKX等主流平台都能交易，所以单看代币本身，INJ的交易活跃度和流动性并不算差。 但最近重新研究INJ，我发现它真正有意思的地方并不是跌了多少。 而是： Injective已经累计销毁超过700万枚INJ，而且生态收入和INJ之间确实存在价值传导。 但与此同时， INJ其实还在增发。 甚至截至今年9月，总供应量实际上已经超过1.2亿枚。 所以研究INJ真正应该问的是： 回购销毁，什么时候能够真正跑赢新增发行？ 以及： Injective讲了这么久“链上金融”，现在到底有没有真实业务支撑？1️⃣ Injective到底是干什么的？ 很多人对Injective的印象还停留在： “Cosmos生态里的一个DEX。” 其实现在已经不太准确。 Injective现在想做的是： 一条专门为金融设计的Layer 1。 简单来说， Ethereum、Solana什么应用都能做。 Waited a bit, still just short of 820, no need to force anything. The low long position hinted at in the early morning shows some small progress. BTC at 804 long, aiming first to secure a 1300-point opening gain.A pressure trough is moving eastward, forming a rare tax front over Washington, with October 15 as its landing point. Most U.S. individual taxpayers who applied for extensions must complete their 2025 filings on this day, which is also the first year Form 1099-DA is in use—covered digital asset brokers must report gross proceeds. In other words, those transaction trails that were previously hidden in low-pressure clouds without radar echoes are being detected by sounding instruments for the first time this year. Having done high-altitude detection for twenty years, what I fear most is never the heavy rain itself, but the sudden activation of all rain gauges. When every sale, every token swap, every digital asset payment, and every staking reward is recorded line by line, market humidity is no longer an estimate but a measured value. The moisture content in the microstructure will condense visibly: some holders will proactively reduce positions to cash out ahead of the front—this is called the downdraft before precipitation; others will hold until the last day, causing typical convective outbreaks with short-term heavy rain and sudden drops in visibility. Over in the Senate, the ADAPT Act is like a cold air mass still wandering over the Mongolian Plateau, with its path and strength yet to be determined. It aims to revise tax rules on stablecoins and staking, but the legislative process itself is a slow cumulonimbus cloud—you can only give probabilities, not a timetable. Policy uncertainty is like wind shear, causing all price balloons to bob up and down. Looking at U.S. stock token assets like $xDELL, their linkage is essentially the coupling of two weather systems. U.S. stocks are a continental air mass—steady rhythm, long cycles; on-chain tokens are a maritime air mass—humid, volatile, and quick to respond. When the tax front presses in, liquidity is first drawn from the thinnest layer, so the chain experiences wind first, and the U.S. stocks get rain later; the time difference is the shear line for arbitrageurs. The fear and greed index now swings like a windsock at 850 hPa altitude; direction doesn’t matter, amplitude does. What really needs watching is not today’s cloud map but the humidity profile over the next seventy-two hours—after the tax deadline, the vapor from selling pressure will quickly dissipate, and the sky may briefly clear, but the ADAPT Act’s cold front is still queued up; the next convective round is just a matter of time. The radar echo hasn’t reached its peak yet; around October 15, the anvil top of the cumulonimbus will first spread out, followed by the real precipitation peak. Storms don’t need anyone’s permission; they just need the conditions to be met. #uscryptotaxfilingoct15Today a brother asked me How to view silver and gold My conclusion is The product positioning of gold is simply a hedge against inflation It is only suitable as "insurance" for assets, not as an investment to make money and increase value. Specific logic: 1: Gold may not outperform inflation in the short term; it only performs well during periods of high inflation and geopolitical tension; during peaceful times with low inflation, it will lag far behind broad-based stock index funds and cryptocurrencies. 2: Gold does not generate cash flow; it has no dividends or interest, essentially making it a safe-haven asset. My current strategy: Use Alipay DCA, investing 700 yuan daily, setting up a DCA strategy that automatically places a 700 yuan gold order every day around 9 AM. The advantage of DCA is peace of mind, no fear of buying at a high price, and it helps average out the cost over the long term. $BTC $ETH $ZEC #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？ #跟着OKX打卡2049 The market cap evaporated over $100 billion in 24 hours, with the total market value dropping to 2.9 trillion. Bitcoin fell below 83,000, Ethereum dropped 6%, and XRP, Solana, Dogecoin fell between 3% to 7%. U.S. Treasury yields are rising, the dollar is strengthening, and with $700 million in leveraged positions liquidated, this sell-off is a result of both capital and technical factors resonating. The fear and greed index is still at 70, greed hasn't retreated, indicating that bottom-fishers are still holding on; such times are often not the bottom. Just opened the security booth window to let some air in; it's quite windy outside. OGN is currently priced at 0.04222. The chart is very clear: volume increased but price stagnated, a long upper shadow at a high level, active selling far exceeding buying—a typical pump and dump. On the liquidation map, a large number of short stop losses are stacked above 0.0445; the main force has no reason to prop up the price to lure buyers. Bullish momentum has already dried up, short-term pullback pressure zone confirmed, with a high probability of testing 0.037 to 0.038. Trading strategy: only short positions. Enter gradually between 0.0422 and 0.0430, take profit at the first target of 0.0390, second target at 0.0375. Set stop loss at 0.0448; if this level is broken, the short logic is invalidated and you must exit. Strictly control drawdown, do not hold losing positions. $OGN #跟着OKX打卡2049 @OKX星球 #三星Q3初步利润首破100万亿韩元 Samsung's preliminary Q3 profit has surpassed 100 trillion KRW for the first time, yet the storage sector faced a collective sell-off in overnight US stock markets, which is indeed unusual. Storage stocks like $MU and $SNDK are under pressure. The market's biggest concern is no longer about storage chips not selling, but how long this super boom cycle can last. Looking at Samsung first, AI server demand is driving up prices for HBM and traditional DRAM, and the profit surge indicates that storage price increases have indeed translated into earnings. $SKHYNIX also benefits from HBM demand, and $MU continues to expand its high-end storage layout. But the problem lies precisely here. The market has already priced in several quarters of anticipated price increases. No matter how good the earnings are, as long as they don't exceed expectations, capital may choose to take profits. The overnight decline looks more like a revaluation and repricing of expectations rather than a sudden end to the storage boom cycle. It's especially important to distinguish between HBM and NAND. The former mainly depends on AI computing demand and capacity allocation, while the latter relies more on consumer electronics, enterprise SSD demand, and supply discipline. These two lines should not be conflated. Next, focus on DRAM spot prices, HBM orders, NAND quotes, and enterprise capital expenditures. If prices continue to rise, the pullback in $MU and $SNDK may just be valuation digestion; if quotes weaken and inventory rises, a real cycle turning point needs to be seriously watched. The most dangerous time for storage stocks is often not when earnings are poor, but when everyone believes the good times will last forever.Don't always think about being a hero, the macro pressure is overwhelming. The US dollar is strong, US Treasury yields are climbing, and oil prices are still above 100, fueling inflation. The Fed minutes haven't come out yet, funds are just waiting at the door, no one is rushing in. The technical side is collapsing first. 87,000 tried several times but couldn't hold, 85,000 and 84,000 were lost consecutively. Volume expands on the drop, the rebound to 84,200 was immediately sold off, the selling pressure is real. Oversold doesn't mean the decline has stopped. The 1h, 2h, 4h RSI6 are at 21, 15, 19 respectively, hands are cold, but MACD is still bearish, the green bars haven't closed, no signal yet. Current position. Struggling below 84,000. Support at 83,200—83,500, 82,500 is the lifeline; resistance at 84,500—85,000. Operation. Wait for a 15-minute volume surge and stop of decline, lightly try long on a pullback to 83,000, stop loss at 82,000, target 84,000—85,000. Stay flat if no signal. Oversold can get even more oversold, the trend hasn't reversed, patience is more valuable than courage.Today's outlook $BTC rebound to 82,700 to 83,000 before considering short, first target 80,450, second target 79,700. You can also wait for the 4H close to break below 79,500 before chasing shorts, target 77,000. Close position if 4H close reclaims 83,500. $ETH rebound to 2,540 to 2,585 before considering short, first target 2,440. You can also wait for the 4H close to break below 2,340 before chasing shorts, target 2,200. Do not chase shorts below 2,450, as near whale liquidation levels there may be sharp spikes followed by quick rebounds. $ZEC rebound to 1,270 to 1,285 before considering short, first target 1,120, position size should be smaller. Do not chase breakouts. Add positions during the downtrend, rebounds may be very sharp. Next few days Today 16:00 OKX weekly settlement and Deribit expiration 22:00 Michigan Consumer Sentiment preliminary (including inflation expectations) 10/12 Monday US bond market closed 10/14 Wednesday 20:30 US September CPI (confirmed by BLS) 10/15 Thursday 20:30 US September PPI 10/16 Friday 16:00 Settlement and expiration 10/20 ZEC NU7 decision day, 10/27-28 Federal Reserve meeting #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 Just after 9 a.m., I was standing in line to buy soy milk when a push notification popped up on my phone: HYPE has climbed back above 84. The uncle ahead of me glanced back at me, probably thinking I had seen some gossip. Actually, nothing major happened; the price just stopped falling. A couple of days ago, it slid from 95 down to 82.6, making holders sweat in their palms, with a 7-day drop of just over 6%. This morning, a bullish candle pulled it back to 84.3, up more than 1% intraday, and the sell orders on the order book have thinned out. Looking at the bigger picture, things aren’t that bad. The 90-day gain is still around 25%, and it has more than doubled over 180 days. This recent pullback feels more like taking a break to drink water while climbing uphill, not turning around to descend. In the short term, there’s a strong trendline pressing around 86.5; the price needs to break above it first to really move forward again. Right now, $HYPE is tugged between 84 and 85, with bulls and bears locked in a stalemate. I sat down with my soy milk and called a friend who trades. He said he’s holding and waiting for a confirmed breakout. I feel the same way—at this stage of the market, it’s not about who runs fastest, but who can hold steady.$UNI: The real risk is not a decline, but the divergence beginning between bullish and bearish signals! What deserves the most attention for UNI right now is not just the price pullback, but the divergence in capital behavior. 📊 Retail bulls still dominate, and top traders' long-short ratio also leans bullish, but short-term active trading data shows slightly stronger selling pressure. Holding bullish positions does not mean capital is continuously buying; this kind of divergence is worth watching out for. The technicals are not strong either: RSI is near a neutral to weak zone, and recent price retracements are obvious. If buying pressure fails to recover soon, any rebound may just be a brief pause in a downtrend. The real focus next is the UNI futures planned by CME. Regulated derivatives could broaden institutional participation and risk hedging channels but will also increase shorting and arbitrage opportunities. The launch of futures does not guarantee a spot price increase, nor can it directly imply ETF approval. My key observations: 🔸 Whether buying pressure can regain the initiative 🔸 Whether the price can stop falling and form higher lows 🔸 How volume and volatility change before and after the futures launch Strategically, there is no rush to bet on direction. If buying pressure does not improve, do not blindly bottom-fish; if volume expands and stabilizes, then consider new opportunities. Controlling leverage and setting stop losses are more important than guessing the market in advance #SepFOMCMinutesHikeWatch #BTCETFFlowParadox #OKXToken2049CheckIn When you're getting hit, you're not there; when it's time to eat meat, you can't be there either. Where is the good thing about only eating meat without getting hit? This is a classic saying by Lin Yuan, and today I verified it with real money. Today, Bitcoin once dropped to $80,744 during the session, breaking below the $81,000 mark, down 3% in 24 hours. Over $1 billion in liquidations occurred across the network, with $1 billion in long positions liquidated and 166,000 people forcibly closed out. My long position also hit the stop-loss line; when it's time to cut losses, you cut, no need to say more. But what I want to say is, what's shameful about losing? In this market, everyone shows off profits, no one shows losses, making it seem like experts never make mistakes. That's the real abnormality. Lin Yuan said, "If you want to eat meat, you must first take the hits." Those glamorous big players have all come through countless times of cutting losses and trial and error. Losses are the cost of trading, the ticket to the table. If you only want to win and never want to lose, then this market is not for you. Being ashamed of losses only makes you stubbornly hold losing positions, ending up losing everything down to your underwear. The structure is intact, the trend is unbroken. Bitcoin at 77,000 is supported by the 50-week moving average, and there are huge buy orders supporting the bottom between 81,800 and 82,100. I stopped out, but I didn't leave; I keep my bullets ready to re-enter at a better position. Accepting losses is the only way to wait for the day to eat meat. #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？ #黄金ETF创纪录吸金，高利率仍压制金价 “No competitive devaluation” is not about calming the exchange rate; it’s a guarantee letter to global central banks saying "I won’t snatch your exports." The latest central bank stance is firm: insist on letting the market play a decisive role in exchange rate formation, never engage in competitive currency devaluation. To translate—RMB fluctuations can be influenced by the dollar, interest rate differentials, and trade surpluses, but it will never deliberately crash the exchange rate just to sell more socks and shoes. Why this old saying is valuable now: The Fed’s rate cut expectations are shaky, the dollar index fluctuates, and emerging markets fear "neighbors devaluing first to grab orders"; Europe and the US are using “RMB manipulation” as a tariff excuse, but the central bank nails down the message: floating ≠ manipulation, counter-cyclical tools ≠ administrative pricing; Domestic enterprises’ hedging demand rises, offshore RMB speculative activity stirs, managing expectations upfront is much cheaper than dumping foreign reserves later. What the market should understand: “Market decides” = daytime volatility will continue to widen, 7.1–7.3 is not a red line but a range; “No competitive devaluation” = will not actively break 7.4, 7.5 to hedge tariffs and boost exports; If there is truly abnormal capital outflow, forward contracts, reserve requirements, and midpoint counter-cyclical factors will be used, but the goal is to prevent loss of control, not to maintain a specific number. When $CORE launched back then, Bitcoin $BTC was priced at around ¥190,000 per coin. On the launch day, retail investors pushed the price of this thing up to a peak of ¥49 each, while Bitcoin rose from about ¥190,000 to a high of ¥850,000 per coin. Now the price has fallen back to ¥540,000 per coin. Looking back at this thing's price, it has already dropped to 12 cents each. Yet the project team keeps shouting about Bitcoin this and Bitcoin that every day—Bitcoin hash power, Bitcoin power grid, Bitcoin non-custodial, global payments, buybacks, and so on. After all these years, why have they stopped shouting now? Where are they all at? Looking back now, isn't it just a big joke 😂Event: The Kingdom of Bhutan - a country famous for secretly using hydropower to mine a large amount of Bitcoin - is showing signs of strategic shift. The latest report indicates they are aiming to cooperate and integrate with the banking system of Abu Dhabi. Notes Detailed analysis: Diversifying Sovereign Wealth portfolio: Bhutan's previous focus on Bitcoin mining brought significant profits but also exposed the national budget to crypto price volatility risks. The move to cooperate with tLast night I saw $BTC drop quite a bit, and I was thinking there should be a small pullback, so I got itchy and entered the market to make a small swing trade. The goal was simple: just make enough to buy a cup of milk tea and then exit. At first, I did make enough for the milk tea. But once greed kicked in, I couldn't bear to leave—thinking since the market was giving me a chance, why not hold a bit longer and try to earn a chicken leg 😂. But when I opened my account this morning: I lost the milk tea money, and the chicken leg was out of the question, almost ended up with nothing 😂. Lesson after lesson, but I just can't remember—basically, it's one word: greed. The hardest part of trading is never opening a position, but sticking to your profit-taking rules. I clearly set the rule myself: take profit and run once I make enough for milk tea. But desire quietly raises your targets; once you have the milk tea, you want the chicken leg; the more you take, the greedier you get, forgetting you only wanted to make a little money in the first place. I hope my lesson serves as a warning to new friends. Have you ever had this experience: starting with a small goal but ending up bitten by greed? I come from spot trading, fully backed by OKB, dabble a little in contracts for fun, profits and losses are my own responsibility. #新手必看：这里有你需要的一切 The United States is forced to move the entire financial market onto the blockchain. It's not because Washington suddenly loves technology, but because the old dollar network can no longer cover it: the share of reserves is dropping, correspondent banks are slow and easily bypassed, and people in fringe markets don't have U.S. bank accounts but do have internet access. Stablecoins first bring the dollar to every place with internet, and tokenization of stocks then brings the U.S. stock market itself in. In theory, any individual on the internet can become a holder and counterparty of dollar assets. China can still compete on manufacturing, electricity, and parts of the supply chain, but the financial layer is blank. Exchange rates, capital flight, and bank balance sheets weld stablecoins and on-chain assets together. This battle can now be said to be a complete defeat. Domestically, people like Lu Qiyuan have long clarified the definition of monetary sovereignty, but speaking out has become problematic because there are too many rebels and fools, and the discussion forums simply cannot hold the debate. PART 01 The old hegemony is no longer sufficient. Dollar hegemony has never been maintained by warships alone. It relies on three overlapping networks: trade and commodity pricing, deep government bond and repo markets, and almost every cross-border dollar transaction ultimately passing through U.S.-regulated banks. These three layers have loosened over the past twenty years. The share of dollars in central bank foreign exchange reserves has dropped from about 70% at the start of the century to less than 60% around 2025. Other countries are expanding their own cross-border clearing, experimenting with local currency settlements, and Europe is building capital markets. The U.S. has not lost dominance; the dollar still accounts for nearly 90% of foreign exchange trading, but the phase of automatic expansion has ended. Old tools cannot fill this gap. Correspondent banks are slow, expensive, and can be cut off at any time by sanctions lists #Solana tokenized stock trading volume exceeded $4.4 billion in September The trading volume of tokenized stocks on the Solana chain's DEX surpassed $4.4 billion in September, setting a new record. Supply reached $684 million (up about 47% in three weeks), with over one million holding wallets, and Raydium contributed more than 60%. 👉🏻Short-term impact This directly boosted on-chain activity. Every transaction burns SOL as Gas, and the surge in DEX transactions like Raydium means both fee income and network usage increased. In the short term, increased capital attention to the Solana ecosystem tends to warm sentiment around $SOL, making its price more volatile. However, market sentiment can rise and fall quickly, and monthly data alone is unlikely to sustain a continuous large rally. 👉🏻Long-term impact The real trend to watch: tokenized stocks are evolving from a "novelty" into a genuine new asset class on Solana, with 24/7 trading, low fees, and integration with DeFi. Over one million holders and rapid supply growth indicate real user adoption. In the long run, this can continuously drive on-chain activity, increase demand for SOL as network fuel, and solidify Solana's leading position in the RWA space. As long as regulatory conditions don't suddenly tighten, this real use case is a solid fundamental positive for $SOL. 👉🏻Overall assessment Mostly positive📈. Short term benefits come from sentiment and activity, long term benefits from ecosystem use case implementation. This is not the kind of factor that will cause an immediate explosive surge $BCH perpetual contract, short position, currently held. Opening average price 294.4, mark price 275.9, unrealized profit +314.19%. Multiple attempts to test the upper resistance failed to hold, high chasing funds gradually exited, bulls continue to weaken, seized the turning point to open short positions accordingly. Position data shows short-term long orders clustered; once the market dips, it is easy to trigger concentrated stop-loss cascades, accelerating the decline. Market conditions change rapidly; do not be blinded by current unrealized profits, reserve position, and beware of sudden violent capital pull-ups. $ZEC $SOL #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？ Trump's recent move shows that the crypto community really doesn't need to focus only on short-term price fluctuations! On October 7, Trump announced the advancement of the "Trump Account," covering about 70 million eligible children in the U.S. Eligible children born between 2025 and 2028 can also receive a one-time $1000 seed investment from the Treasury. The key is not the $1000 itself, but cultivating a generation's investment habits from a young age. This time, crypto industry companies like Coinbase and Robinhood are involved, which is worth the crypto community's attention. I am optimistic about three directions: First, the investor demographic is getting younger. If children are exposed to investing early, will they be more likely to accept Bitcoin and other digital assets as adults? Second, the integration of traditional finance and the crypto industry. Crypto platforms are competing for a broader financial user base; future competition won't just be about coin prices but also users and capital. Third, long-term capital is the key. Don't shout bull market just because Trump made a move; this policy doesn't directly inject funds into $BTC, and the account's investment scope is limited. My judgment: don't overinterpret in the short term, but it's worth watching long term. Today, investment habits in stocks are being cultivated; will more young people include crypto assets in their portfolios in the future? If the next generation in the U.S. has investment accounts from childhood, when they grow up, will $BTC become their standard allocation? Let's discuss in the comments.DOT Unleashes a Big Move: Native Stablecoin dotUSD Launches, But First Day Sees a Bullish Pump Followed by Sell-Off Polkadot recently launched its native stablecoin dotUSD on the mainnet, with a pretty impressive narrative — no single issuer, co-governed on-chain by DOT holders through OpenGov, marking a top-tier Layer 1 stepping in to claim a piece of the stablecoin market. Currently priced at $1.127, up about 3.4% in 24 hours, but it hit a low of $1.009 earlier today, almost clawing its way out of a dip. Spot trading volume in 24 hours is around $10 million, showing normal liquidity for a major coin, not a thin market pump. Looking into the details, the first phase of dotUSD is actually issued and redeemed 1:1 pegged to USDT. The real mechanism that allows DOT to become collateral, driving locked value and buy pressure, is still to come. Simply put, the storytelling aspect currently outweighs real demand, as evidenced by DOT dropping on launch day, indicating selling pressure. Today's bullish candle is more of an oversold rebound following the broader market rally. Technically, RSI is at 63, not yet overbought, with price pressing against the upper Bollinger Band at 1.131 and resistance at 1.132. Next, it depends on whether volume can push past the previous high near 1.14; if it fails and falls back below the 1.10 support, this move remains a rebound, not a reversal. $DOT #Polkadot #Stablecoin Not investment advice, DYORHolding SOL for so long, how many times have we seen pullbacks? This time it didn’t move either. From $123 down to $105, the unrealized profit in the account shrank a bit, but the position? Not reduced at all. As for the market, every time it rallies, it has to pull back a bit—that’s an old rule, nothing to panic about. Just look at the candlestick chart, it only dropped for two days, volume expanded then shrank back, and the buy orders around $109 held steady. A 7-day pullback of 9% sounds scary, but if you look longer term, it’s up 39% in 90 days and 33% in 180 days. A few bearish candles on a half-year chart are just a small episode. Another thing, Jump Crypto’s Firedancer wallet has staked 450,000 SOL, locking in about $50 million. Institutions are voting with real money, so why should I waver over a few days of pullback? Anyway, my logic hasn’t changed: public chains compete on performance and ecosystem, and $SOL holds both. Let the price fluctuate, just hold your chips steady. Once the pullback is over, the market will naturally give the answer.$BTC's price has plummeted nearly 99%, and now this star L2 is actually considering transforming into an L1? $STRK has dropped about 99% from its all-time high, with the current price around $0.056 and a circulating market cap of approximately $410 million. Currently, Starknet is considering breaking away from the Ethereum L2 architecture to become an independent L1, aiming to become a fully quantum-resistant public chain by 2027. Quantum computing and AI are accelerating cryptographic research, potentially threatening the elliptic curve signatures used by Bitcoin and Ethereum in the future. Starknet itself uses a hash-based ZK-STARK proof system, and wallets can flexibly switch signature schemes, which indeed offers technical advantages. However, the issue is that it still relies on Ethereum for underlying security guarantees, and Ethereum plans to complete its full L1 quantum resistance upgrade by the end of 2029. StarkWare has historically raised about $282.5 million in funding, with a valuation as high as $8 billion during its 2022 equity financing, backed by top institutions like Paradigm, Sequoia, and Coatue. But now, Starknet's DeFi TVL is only about $160 million, and the daily on-chain fees generated recently are just a few thousand dollars. Recently, Blast and Abstract announced shutdowns one after another, and now even Starknet is starting to consider switching tracks.ETH is currently at 2,462, down 4.17% in 24 hours, having broken below 2,500. Three things are happening simultaneously: ETH ETFs have been bleeding for 7 consecutive days, with a single-day outflow of 161 million, totaling 569 million since the end of September, with BlackRock accounting for 72%. The largest treasury buyer BitMine announced it has reached its position limit (5%), Tom Lee confirmed no further purchases, and BMNR dropped 7% that day. In the past 24 hours, the entire network liquidations reached 919 million, with longs accounting for 91.25%, ETH liquidations leading at 327 million. Long positions are still being liquidated. Macro conditions remain tight: US Treasury yields are high, oil prices are rising, and the fear and greed index has dropped to 59. Strategy: Short on rebound at 2,620-2,650, target 2,500→2,450, stop loss at 2,712. If it breaks back above 2,700, reverse and exit. Risk: RSI is oversold, a technical rebound is possible, do not chase shorts. There are risks on both sides, manage your position size carefully.Hot Coin Data Ranking｜Last 15 Minutes $STRK surged with increased volume and holdings. Trading volume reached 3,321,000 USDT, 4.0 times the average 15-minute volume converted from the previous hour; price +1.66%, holdings +3.24%.The 500u challenge to reach 10,000u, plus the previously mentioned 360u, has already accumulated 1100u, completing one-tenth of the challenge! Let's first look at the current status of Bitcoin $BTC and Ethereum $ETH, especially the Ethereum bull flag I mentioned before being broken! This doomed a sharp drop, as you can see from my previous posts! Currently, I personally think the main reasons for the decline are definitely the rise in crude oil causing inflation and interest rate hikes! Plus, most believe the Federal Reserve will raise rates once more this year, and there was a massive ETF outflow last night. I personally believe we are currently in a downtrend! Unless the decline stops and key short-term levels are recovered, ETF outflows significantly narrow, and ETH retakes the broken area. Only with these signals combined will a rebound be more credible.$BTC really touched 80,000 last night, this time looking a bit worse than the past two days BTC is now around 81,700, with last night's low having dipped to 80,345. 💸 The ETF is definitely running money this time. On October 7, the US BTC spot ETF had a net outflow of $484.9 million in one day, with BlackRock IBIT itself outflowing $207.7 million; the data disclosed so far on October 8 shows about -$41.5 million. Over $500 million in two days. This is different from the previous days where "money flowed out one day and was bought back the next"; I'll watch for a couple more days. 🏛️ Yesterday, the US government wallet made a big move again. 12,267 BTC related to the Bitfinex hacker case, worth about $1 billion, were transferred out as a whole. But don't rush to call it a dump just because "the US government moved $1 billion BTC"—these coins currently went to untagged wallets, not exchanges, and there is no evidence of sales. 🌍 Things outside aren't calm either. Brent crude closed at $104.28 last night, up about 4% again. The US 10-year yield was still fluctuating at high levels intraday, but the 30-year Treasury auction demand was good, and the 10-year yield later fell back to 5.227%. #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 BTC breaks below 81,000: Old support turns into new resistance, $1 billion liquidation night Summary first: The 82,000–83,000 range has flipped from support to resistance, BTC breaks below 81,000 with an intraday low of 80,900. Current price is 81,765, positioned between the daily MA20 (84,038) and MA50 (80,660), a sandwich position. Directionally, the range is bearish, with the 82,500–83,000 rebound resistance zone as the first hurdle. On October 8, during the New York session on Thursday, BTC broke below the 82,000–83,000 range for the third time, hitting an intraday low of 80,900, down 2.8% in 24 hours, the lowest since September 21. This is the third breakdown since September 23 after being resisted near 87,000: the 82,000–83,000 band was resistance in May and September, flipped to support in early October, and flipped back to resistance on Thursday. Spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $484.9 million on Wednesday (the largest since June 25, with IBIT alone outflowing $207.7 million); the entire market saw $974 million liquidated in 24 hours, of which $896 million were long positions (ETH led with $311 million liquidated, BTC $238 million). Brent crude surged from $101 to $105 (due to escalating tensions in the Strait of Hormuz disrupting tanker traffic); 10-year US Treasury yields at 5.35%, 30-year at 5.73%, both multi-decade highs; the US Dollar Index at 102.293, approaching an 18-month high of 102.535. Oil, bonds, and the dollar are all strengthening simultaneously, leading to a repricing of long-duration assets. October 9 morning (OKX BTC-USDT-SWAP): Daily price at 81,765, MA20 at 84,038.8, MA50 at 80,660.4, price sandwiched between the two moving averages, ATR14 at 1,949; 4-hour MA20 at 83,804.6, MA50 at 84,518.9, price below both moving averages, short-term MA below long-term MA; 1-hour cycle high at 86,963.7 (October 5) to cycle low at 80,351 (October 8), three waves down. Directional range is bearish, participate in rebounds under resistance, do not chase the dip. Trigger: rebound to 82,500–83,000 (lower edge of the flip zone) faces resistance. Stop loss: above 83,500 (breaking above the upper edge of the flip zone signals structural strength). Target: 81,000, break below to watch 80,000 round number, then 79,299. No trading zone: 80,000–80,900 first touch no shorting, round number plus liquidation low overlap, first touch likely to rebound; no counter-trend shorting above 83,000. Risk control: participate with half position; US government shutdown delayed September nonfarm payrolls, data blackout, event risk is high before the October 28–29 FOMC; monitor US Treasury yields and the US Dollar Index, strengthening on either side will transmit to BTC first.There are transactions, but the price hasn't agreed yet $AAVE has a 24-hour trading volume of about $313 million, but the price still slightly declined, falling about 6.2% over the week. Just because there are trades doesn't mean buyers are willing to continuously push the price up. Trading volume counts both buys and sells, so this number alone can't determine whether funds are flowing in or out. I think we need to see what results remain after the transactions. A price rise that can push the price higher and a pullback that can hold the level better indicate buying pressure at work. If trading remains active but the price keeps retreating, the activity can't be taken as a bullish sign. For now, observe the recovery and don't rush to interpret participation as upward momentum. $LINK is around 13, down about 9% over the week, and short-term weakness persists. I won't assume support just because it returned near a round number. This level is easy to remember, but the market may not care. If it can climb back above 13 and hold on pullbacks, then the outlook improves; if it just crosses back and forth, it still shows the direction is unclear. $RE has dropped less than 1%, but declined nearly 10% over the week, so it's still some distance from stabilizing or strengthening again. I want to see if the next rebound continues. Slowing the decline can ease some pressure but doesn't raise profit expectations yet. First end the retreat, then resume the rise, letting the price answer step by step. For now, watch more and act less, wait for confirmation.🐬 $SNDK $: Start hedging at position 1620 78.6% retracement of the old upward segment: 1733.4 − (1733.4 − 1618.1) × 0.786 ≈ 1642.77 38.2% rebound of the new downward segment: 1586.3 + (1733.4 − 1586.3) × 0.382 ≈ 1642.49 Looking higher at 1660–1664: • 50% rebound level of this round's decline: 1659.85 • Daily MA50: about 1659.9 • 1-hour MA50: about 1663.5 • 15-minute MA200: about 1663.9 This is a resistance zone concentrated with moving averages and Fibonacci levels. If it can be reclaimed and held on a pullback, the quality of the rebound will significantly improve, then look for the 61.8% rebound level near 1677. Below, first focus on 1610–1618, then 1600 and 1586.3. Support appears near 1586, but two bottom tests alone are not enough to confirm a double bottom; if it breaks down effectively, the rebound structure will be damaged again. My observation sequence: **First see if 1627 can break through, then if 1643 can hold, and finally if 1660–1664 can be reclaimed.** Changes in judgment must follow the close and pullback, not just rely on a single bullish candlestick. Vitalik warns: AI may accelerate the weakening of cryptographic security. In the past, the main concern was quantum computers, but now Vitalik has added AI to the risk list. This morning he posted that AI's mathematical research capabilities are rapidly improving and may find shortcuts to certain cryptographic algorithms faster. He specifically mentioned lattice cryptography: this technology was originally considered an important solution against quantum computing, but he believes that with AI's mathematical progress in the next two years, the currently assumed security strength of lattice cryptography may be significantly weakened. Even more troubling, the ECDSA signatures widely used in Bitcoin and Ethereum wallets may face pressure earlier than previously expected. However, this does not mean AI can currently crack wallets. Vitalik instead reminds users not to rush to transfer coins or change wallets, as operational mistakes themselves can cause losses. He is more inclined to use simpler hash-based cryptographic schemes in the future.Citibank is bullish on $BTC up to 113,000, so why did 100,000 people get liquidated in 24 hours? Bitcoin plunged nearly $2,000 in 20 minutes, directly breaking below the key $84,000 level. In the past 24 hours, over 100,000 people were liquidated across the market, with total liquidations around $1.02 billion, most of which were longs. Just a week ago, Citibank raised Bitcoin's 12-month target price to $113,000. The same Bitcoin is a meat grinder for long liquidations here, while over there it is the "digital gold" named bullish by investment banks. The players in this game are no longer a simple "retail vs. whales" opposition, but four forces making moves simultaneously at the table: early holders taking profits, derivatives market makers distributing, ETFs and listed companies accumulating, and the macro interest rate environment choking everyone. To understand this game, you first need to see clearly the chips each player holds. #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？ Is something big coming? No. It's the Federal Reserve digging up old issues. On Wednesday afternoon, the September meeting minutes will be released. Not new interest rates. It's the old ledger. They dare not raise rates, but can't avoid it either, so they can only raise next month. The awkwardness is written all over their faces. The dollar is relatively strong. Long-term bond yields are above 5%. Crypto circle: I want to leave on my own. Legs: No, you don't want to. $BTC 82,000. On Monday it surged to 87,000 but was pushed back. The third test since September 23. Like a puppy dog confessing love. Rejected all three times. Can 8.2-8.0 hold? $ETH Follows Bitcoin. Not much change in price. Can't lead the rhythm. Like the quietest colleague at a team-building event. $OKB Singapore meeting. Global Product and Ecosystem Conference. From an exchange to a fintech platform. Challenging the world's largest exchange? First ask if Binance agrees. Opportunities come from waiting, not chasing. Just venting. Not investment advice. #ThisWeekTheFedWillReleaseSeptemberMeetingMinutes #BTCWhaleSellingPressureWeakens,ETFFundsNetInflowForThreeConsecutiveWeeks #USLongTermBondYieldsHitNewHighs,30YearApproaches5.7%The market showed a bottom-finding and V-shaped rebound, hitting a low of 2405.07, then continuously closing higher with a rebound, current price 2476.62. KDJ indicator: K71.19, D55.04, J103.49; the J value has entered the overbought zone, indicating a short-term need for a pullback. Key levels Support below: 2440, strong support at 2405, the low point of this round, Resistance above: 2520, strong resistance at 2568 (previous high) Trend outlook After a large bearish candlestick rapidly hammered the market, buying support was strong, leading to a corrective rebound. But the one-hour KDJ is overbought, so avoid chasing longs. The rebound faces pressure near the 2520 resistance zone; shorting can be attempted with a target to continue down to 2400 $BTC #9月FOMC纪要公布，多数官员倾向再加息 【BTC Intraday Analysis】 If this rebound is not taken, the direction today continues to be bearish. 80345 indeed showed strength, but the price started to stall around 81800, with each 1-hour candle weaker than the last, and the 4-hour chart hasn't recovered the previous large-volume bearish candle. The biggest problem isn't how much it has fallen, but that the bulls have accumulated so many chips and still can't push out a second wave of gains. This looks more like a breather after a short squeeze, not a bottom reversal. The main force lifting the price from the lows is creating a sense of security for bottom-fishers; the real buying hasn't chased the price upward. On October 9 Beijing time, I judge BTC's rebound space to be limited, and after a weak rally, it will look for support downward again. The main intraday trend remains weak and downward. To reverse this short-term trend, at least a strong rally with continuous volume increase must be seen, which is not evident in the current market.🔥 Just two days after breaking below 82,000, the unrealized liquidation on the books nears $100 million ⚡ The market broadly declines, yet contrarian funds quietly increase positions in coins like IP and XMR ⏰ Geek reminder: In a spike market, better to miss out than catch a falling knife 📌 Market data BTC: Broke through 81,839, holding between 81,000-83,000 OI (Open Interest): $27.5 billion, 24h -0.48% 24h total liquidations: $92.4 million Funding rate: +0.0069%, slightly positive but not extreme 📊 Geek logic 1️⃣ OI and price contract simultaneously, indicating this wave is existing long positions stopping loss and exiting, not shorts aggressively entering to grab chips 2️⃣ Funding rate hasn’t turned negative, shorts have not formed a consensus expectation yet, likely still leverage reduction rather than trend reversal 🎯 Key defense and attack levels Below: 80,000 psychological line, losing it opens the way to test lows Above: 85,000-87,000 resistance zone, reclaiming it means stabilization 🎤 Risk control mindset: Set stop losses, enter on the right side, don’t catch falling knives mid-slope. Now for contracts, are you holding your position, adding to cost, or cutting losses and exiting? A Hold and wait for rebound / B Add to average down / C Cut losses and exit 👇 $BTC $SUI $xMRVL #比特币矿企Riot获Anthropic算力大单 #Strategy再度增持，财库同步加仓 Good morning, just a second ago I was fighting for my long position in the ICU, and this morning when I opened my eyes, wow, I directly moved into the short army's KTV! Let's review these three proud "heroes": $ETH: The serfs have turned over and sing! Opened at 2530.57, current price 2473.93, wildly pocketed 249.83U, ROI +44.76%. Two days ago still struggling to survive in the long position, now reversed to short and eating big, forced liquidation at 2645, rock solid like an old dog. $SOL: The most outrageous on the field! Opened at 112.33, dropped to 109.13, angrily earned 238.52U, ROI +56.97%. A couple of days ago the drop made me want to pull the plug, today the drop makes me want to set off firecrackers. This overwhelming wealth, finally it's my turn! $BTC: The big brother focuses on companionship. Opened at 82569.41, current price 81767, steadily took 61.68U (+19.65%). Even mosquito legs are meat, having a sip of soup, feeling great. Overall floating profit 550U! Compared to the blood loss in long positions a couple of days ago, today I managed to fleece the dog dealer with both principal and interest. The fact proves again: stubbornly holding long positions feels good for a moment, but following the trend to short is a crematorium (burning all the dog dealer's money). A new day, put away the fantasy of bottom fishing. No holding positions, no greed, continue to be a decent short soldier with profits. Control positions, control positions, still control positions! #跟着OKX打卡2049 #全球长期国债收益率升至多年高位 #黄金ETF创纪录吸金，高利率仍压制金价 $BTC Excerpted from the original words of the ten big targets of the big whale. This time during the pullback, what I care about most is not how much it fell, but: why it only fell this much. Recently, there have actually been quite a few macro negative factors. The 30-year US Treasury yield is close to 5.7, the 10-year is around 5.3; the expectation of another rate hike within the year has strengthened; oil prices and inflation pressures have re-emerged; the suspected plague incident in Russia has also brought some panic. In the past, many of these news items alone would have been enough to cause BTC to drop. Now, with several negative factors coming out together, BTC only pulled back about 5%. So I have always thought: news is the surface, the price's reaction to the news is the real information. Most people trading are actually driven by emotions. When prices rise, they only see good news; when prices fall, they only see bad news. But only a few can sift through many appearances to find the truly useful information. All appearances are illusory. When negative factors increase but the price becomes increasingly resistant to falling, that itself indicates something. This is somewhat similar to when BTC was at 58,000, but not exactly the same. At 58,000, after extreme pessimism, the market began to show signs of being unable to sell. Now, in a strong trend, macro pressures continue, but the price still hasn't been truly broken. So currently, I don't think it will directly fall to 7.8, much less to 7.4. But trading doesn't require proving you're always right. If it breaks below 7.9, I start reducing positions. If the daily candle closes below 7.8, all remaining long positions exit. If it doesn't break below, continue holding $BTC dropped to $80,300 ETF funds have also started to change BTC hit a low near $80,300 yesterday. A few days ago, there was still talk about breaking through $87,000, but now it has returned to the $80,000 level. Recent changes in ETF funds deserve special attention. On October 6, the US spot BTC ETF had a net inflow of about $119 million, but on October 7, it directly turned into a net outflow of about $485 million. Among them, BlackRock IBIT outflowed $208 million, Fidelity FBTC outflowed $105 million, and ARKB outflowed $102 million. In other words, within just one trading day, ETF funds experienced a significant reversal. However, a single day of ETF outflow does not mean institutions are withdrawing long-term, especially now that US bond yields are rising and expectations of rate hikes have not faded. It is not surprising that some funds temporarily reduce risk asset allocations. I still believe it is necessary to closely watch the area around $80,000. If BTC can reclaim $83,000–$84,000, there is still room for short-term recovery; but if $80,000 cannot hold, altcoins may face a larger round of adjustment. #ETF仍在流入，BTC为何下跌？
Orbit Topic Sitemap